Make no mistake – digitalization is a good idea. Automation is a good idea. Thinking of a business in terms of its processes is a great idea. But it would be a mistake to think that these efforts are, well, effortless. Digital transformation is not magic. It requires work. It’s worth it, but again – it’s not magic; deploying somebody’s platform does not guarantee success.
The are many “right ways” to do digitalization; it very much depends on company-specific goals, properties, and constraints. Doing it “the wrong way,” however, seems to follow a set of commonly-seen (and reseen) patterns.
So here are five common mistakes production companies often make – and that you’ll want to avoid:
1. Supporting process digitization with IT systems in place
Every production company is almost certainly familiar with ERP and MES systems, the line of business platforms that support resource management and other key production and operational functions. It’s rare that they aren’t already well-established. And it’s for this reason that, when presented with an opportunity to build a new digital business process, the temptation is to try and expand on these LOB systems first. And yes, that’s often a mistake.
ERP and MES systems aren’t even universally able to be used to implement a variety of business processes. Even when they’re able to do it, they still might not be particularly good at it.
The LOB systems serve very specific and elaborate purposes. They’re expansive platforms, but they’re still optimized on the business problems they were designed to solve. It’s rare that even fans of such systems would describe them as “flexible.”
Contorting an inventory system to handle ad-hoc research and development, or employee lifecycle management, or quality assurance testing done by deliberately inducing problems and monitoring how they’re addressed? That is a recipe for frustration. Its database doesn’t have a place to store that kind of information. The forms don’t consider such scenarios. The business logic engine is even further removed from these kinds of things.
The examples just listed require thinking in terms of cases, not inputs/throughputs/outputs. You might be able to force platforms to implement activity contrary to their design, but he results will take a lot of time and effort to produce and even more time and effort to maintain.
What to do instead? Deploy a low-code platform that understands managing business processes, integration across systems, and cases that might require different steps at different times for different work. What’s more, platforms like this allow for even more solutions to be built for internal processes, partner and customer interactions, document and content efforts, and business processes that involve activity in multiple-yet-separate LOB solutions.
“Problems with updating the ERP system are among the issues most frequently raised by IT managers in manufacturing companies. These issues often stem from companies having dedicated solutions, prepared at the stage of deployment or during further use by integration companies responsible for installation,” says Lukasz Wrobel, Chief Business Development Officer at WEBCON. “You can avoid these problems by using an external low-code platform that enables easy integration with ERP. Migration of the ERP system to a newer version will be easier then, and if you grow out of that, it will be easier and cheaper to replace it.